After notice and data protection offshore SEO company threatens negative reputation management campaign

Companies get a smear campaign threat from its outsourced firm of SEO, because the company knows, Google is algorithm false negative results, helps what Google claims to show an impartial view of the Web.

Refer to this email and tell me if you tend to save a few dollars or that go with a reputable SEO company, you qualified SEO link builders and an on-going professional relationship can offshore rent would.

This is in response to a request to cancel service for a month to month service offering:

Click to enlarge the

The legal nature of this tactic is questionable in the United States but not rent an offshore companies offer the same protection by a "negative reputation campaign."

It is incredible that a SEO would put his own reputation on the line with such an E-mail business, as a client with another SEO company has decided. I've seen this tactic for more than a decade in both Web design/development and SEO and its very unhappy.

A few weeks ago, tweaked their algorithm DecorMyEyes.com after the New York Times published an article discussing Google penalize their alleged fraudulent business practices resulted in alleged increased Google rankings.

Bottom line: Google took action! You must continue this effort with sites like RipOffReport.com ComplaintsBoard.com DESCAM.de, other Web sites that seem to get very high positions in the Google search engine results pages (SERPs) and Google algorithm favors.

Finding brand names you see published often negative complaints on these URLs to the top of the SERPs. I would like to understand, see these URLs with negative information displays in the SERPs for searches like:

Brand name ScamBrand name SucksBrand name ComplaintsBrand name problem MailsAndMore other keyword combinations based on negative terms

But if a trademark is the only keyword and a complaint site that shows URL to # 2, it is probably an imbalance of credibility with Google algorithm that the complaint site advantage.

Note the backlink portfolio to the URLs listed guarantee no # 2-ranking is still Google of considers that a similar credible Web site for each counter in the world with little more than a brand that appears should rank in a page title, header tag and content body. At least Google's love affair with Wikipedia, it can be argued that Wikipedia get earning thousands of links individually and therefore a top ranking deep pages.

What have I missed this post and cause of action to Google to do the right thing? Please comment and share.

View the original article here