Who can benefit from Google's guidelines for?

Some of you can Google's 20 October algorithm change made.

And some of you would not have noticed no difference.

October was devastated a number of sites. Rankings and traffic, fell through the floor. The webmaster forums, lit.Aaron noticed I noticed it. Still, other webmasters asked me what all the fuss was about.

As many of you know, not only is it a ranking are many algorithms Algothimn.Es. What does on a Web site can not another impact. More interesting is that Google's John Mu appeared in this thread on Google offers support forum, these words of wisdom (HatTip: Barry)

It looks like the changes, algorithmic changes see our recent may be of an algorithmic Änderung.Als part (the outside world sometimes refers than "may day update" because it happened in may in the first place), our algorithms that evaluate site differently. This is a ranking change any manual spam penalty, and not due to technical issues regarding crawl and indexing your content."You can hear more about this change in Matt's video:"

... and...

Of our algorithms can apply different parts to sites at different times, depending on what our algorithms find. While we first this change earlier change in this year, the Web changes, sites rolled out, and with our algorithms are constantly fit on the current state on the net on these websites.It confusing to see these changes at the same time as this problem could be while really are not yet is this is a general algorithm change (so if changes from other sites recently saw it probably applies to you as well).

Matt's video, made in four months was talking about the algorithmic MayDay change.John MU adds: "Different parts of our algorithms can apply sites at different times" in other words, what happened in may may affect in may, June or July your site but beat could many months Später.Dies means that your site can a trip threshold and differently judged the day be as it was before.

Not yet complete this explain why so many websites have been on the same day taken, but then not Google usually in detail explain things.

To complicate matters, there was a recognized indexing problem, impact on new content, especially on Blogs.John seems again, suggest this was another question.

Now all SEOs are changes algorithm verwendet.Nichts Neues.Aber this one has me really confused, especially because of the type of sites that have reached.

Time for some self searching-Q and A about one of my own sites:

Q: so you buy how many links?
A: none.
Q: sell links are you?
A: nope.
Q: link "bad neighborhoods"?
A: no, that ' I'm aware...
F: build link in a aggressive manner?
A: No. I no link building fact, equal to whatever.
Q: huh?
A: this is not a question.
Q: so published you just content?
A: right.
Q: and people to your website on their own initiative?
A: yep.Ich think you liked it.
Q: was heavily SEO would your content?
A: Nr. in fact, I writer gave specific instructions not to something like "SEO Copywriting" tun.Der procedures for readers ruins.
Q: all original content?
A: all original.Hand geschrieben.Keine machines everywhere involved.
Q: so does this site to Google Webmaster guidelines?
"A: I would say it is good in you.""Be useful for end-users," was the guiding principle.

But it has hit hard.

What is interesting is also the nature of sites, ersetzt.Ich you checked keyword by keyword, and script was controlled, aggressive Black Hat, content-free Web sites in top-Positionen.Nicht in all cases - there are certainly useful sites, which deserve to be there and earn werden.Fair me displayed Play.Allerdings there many websites of - say - occupying dubious merit high positions.

Curious.

Now, I believe in other than the basics publish useful, unique content and not too much attention to SEO, abdecken.SEO is a strategy that should see many and websites and first and foremost, prove useful to people.

Clearly, no website is immun.Sie can remain inside of Google's webmaster guidelines and get herausgenommen.Ich knew that anyway, but if the sites that follow the guidelines replace...

...I admit to - grid.

Probably Google rewarded the websites that it likes with high ranking and if we fill a lot of aggressive sites top page appears, we should therefore assume that aggressive sites are what will Google?

I would like to believe.

Maybe you're just trying to mess with our minds?

Or confusion?

Or changes are still in bed?

Or you really want it this way?

I'm still watching when you consider und.vielleicht is the site just pop of in due course sichern.Oder maybe I need to back on the Reißbrett.Ich'll let you know how I get.

If you have noticed something similar on your websites, chime in on the comments.

View the original article here