Wednesday, June 23, 2010

Interview of Tedster from WebmasterWorld

Apr
06

If you have been in the SEO field for any serious length of time you have probably come across (and benefited from) some of Tedster's work - either directly, or indirectly from others who have repackaged his contributions as their own. He is perhaps a bit modest, but there are few people in the industry as universally well respected as he is. I have been meaning to interview him for a while now, and he is going to be speaking at Pubcon South on April 14th in Dallas, so I figured now was as good a time as any :)

How long have you been an SEO, and how did you get into the field?

I started building websites in 1995 and the word SEO hadn't been invented. I came from a background in retail marketing, rather than technology or graphic design. So my orientation wasn't just "have I have built a good site?", but also "are enough people finding my site?"

The best method for bringing in traffic seemed to be the search engines, so I began discussing this kind of marketing with other people I found who had the same focus. Ah, the good old days, right? We were so basic and innocently focused, you know?

If you could list a few key documents that helped you develop your understanding of search, which would be the most important ones?

Here are a few documents that acted as major watersheds for me:

1989: Scott Deerwester - Latent Semantic Analysis (Patent)1997: Jon Kleinberg - HITS Algorithm (PDF)1998: Page & Brin - PageRank (Patent)2003: Microsoft - VIPS: A Vision-based Page Segmentation Algorithm (PDF)2004: Yahoo - Combating Web Spam with TrustRank (PDF)2005: Google - Information retrieval based on historical data (Patent)2006: Google - Phrase-Based Indexing (Patent)2008: Google - Interleaving Search Results (Patent)

Is PageRank still crucial? Or have other things replaced it in terms of importance?

What PageRank is measuring (or attempting to measure) is still very critical

View the Original article

No comments:

Post a Comment