16
A common practice in the marketing space is for people to diminish what you do, state that it is below them, help rebrand your stuff in a negative light, and then at some point in the future basically clone the idea (maybe with a few new features, maybe not) and then push their clone job aggressively as though it is revolutionary.
Another shady practice is when you ask people for advice and they say "no don't do that" and then as soon as they hang up the phone they send off emails to their workers telling them to do that which they told you was a bad idea.
I don't think that the average person or the average marketer is inherently sleazy. But I think when you look at the people who are the most successful certainly a larger than average percent of them engaged in shady behavior at some point.
To keep building yield and returns at some point short cuts start to look appealing. And so you get
the word of mouth marketing organization sending out brazen spam - and being proud of it automated ad networks designed to maximize yield without concern for what they are pushing - even if they categorize some of the offers as "get rich quick" scams a search service which wraps its ads around tons of pirated copyright content - paying thieves to steal it & trying to force more of the copyright content onlineNone of the above is a cynical take or an opinion at this point. That was simply a list of 3 stated facts.
Create a large enough organization with enough people and you can always make something shady seem like it was due to the efforts of a rogue individual, rather than as company policy. A key to doing this effectively within a large organization is to publish public thoughts that are the exact opposite of your internal business practices.
The word "propaganda" was a bad word, as that is what the Germans were using, so Edward Bernays had to give it another name - public relations.
Recently the Google public policy blog published a post titled Celebrating Copyright. Around the same time Viacom leaked the following internal Google document
View the Original article
No comments:
Post a Comment